The Latin term, primus inter pares, means first among equals. As typically defined, it is the senior most person on a team of equals. Robert Greenleaf uses the term as one way to understand the nature of servant leadership. Both terms, primus inter pares and servant leadership are principally about the character and relationship of leaders to others. These are not descriptions of a system of organization. Rather, they are descriptions of how a person relates to people within a given structure.
Let's use my Three Dimensions of Leadership diagram as a guide.
Primus inter pares, first among equals, is an idea that describes a relationship. It means that one of the people within a group has an authority that exceeds the others, yet they are equal in some respect. Their equality could be based on the roles within the organizational structure, or the lack of a specific structure.
For example, a group of sales people meet to discuss strategies for coordinating their outreach to the market. One of the members of this group may emerged as the defacto leader of the group. This first among equals earns this position within the social structure of the group because of experience, knowledge, or personal character. They may be the most strategic thinker, or the best at facilitating conversation, but ultimately, this person emerges as the one who makes the group function best.
It is important to understand the connection between the social structure of an organization, the Relationships dimension, and the organizational structure. Within the latter, individuals have titles, roles, positions of authority and responsibility. In organizations where the Relationship dimension is poorly developed, the organizational structure will more likely be hierarchical, segmented, resistant to change. In organizations where the Organizational Structure is dysfunctional, meaning how the business is organized is not compatible with its mission and inhibits the people within the organization from doing their best work, the Relationship dimension strengthens to a certain level to facilitate daily survival. In this instance, some individual will emerge as the primus inter pares.
The importance of a culture of primus inter pares is that it provides a greater degree of openness for relationships to develop. People are more free to exchange ideas. The organization thinks more strategically, than tactically, or rather tactics and strategy are much better coordinated because the communication and interaction level of the organization is much higher.
Does functioning as a primus inter pares enhance the role of CEO in an organization? I believe it does. The challenge is to learn how do be a first-among-equals while also being the boss. The distinction is between the Relationship and Organizational Structure dimensions.
If the CEO, simply functions within the parameters of the executive role, what ultimately happens is a narrowing of the relationship network available to him or her. When a CEO fails to develop a relationship network as a primus inter pares, then there is a closing off of access to information.
Ron Burt in his two books, Structural Holes and Brokerage and Closure, writes about how relationship networks provide access to information that gives entrepreneurs a competitive advantage. The advantage is between the person who has a widely dispersed, diverse network of relations, and the person who doesn't.
Recently, I heard Meridith Elliot Powell speak on the develop a relationship network strategy. She identifies three different networks that leaders need to develop. There is an Enterprise network functioning within the business, a Business network of relationships within the business' industry, and then, a Strategic network of people who provide information that would not typically be available to those in the
other two networks.
What these networks do is open up the CEO to learn what he or she needs to know that within the more closed, restricted circle of executives is not available. Within the closed circle, the CEO can act as supreme authority, but within an open, diverse network of relations, the CEO must act as a primus inter pares at least.
Within this network perspective, the CEO comes to understand that what he or she doesn't know is more important than what is known. Access to people with different perspectives and knowledge broadens the CEO's own perspective. The relationship to those outside the executive circle is not an Organizational Structural one, but rather a personal and professional one. There is relative equality based on the basic human need for trust and respect in the relationship. We approach those relationships with humility and openness to learn, and have perceptions broadened. And in exchange, the CEO provides perspective to those outside the executive suite.
Servant leadership is an ethic of relationship between leaders and followers. It is organizationally understood best from the primus inter pares relationship. As the first among equals, the CEO and other executives broaden their relationship network, putting them in a competitive advantage with those executives who do not. Primus inter pares is not a tactic for leadership success. It is an ethic for building strength within an organization. If the CEO is able to engender trust and confidence in him or herself, it will be because of both their competence in the role of leader and their relationship of openness and equality with people. And becoming a primus inter pares within one's relationship network as a servant leader is a path to leadership success.
Recent Comments